The Hidden Costs of Skipping Product Discovery (And How to Avoid Them)
In product management, there’s constant pressure to move fast. Leadership wants results, engineers want clear specs, and stakeholders want their features delivered yesterday. In this rush, many teams cut corners on Product Discovery, convinced they don’t have time for research, testing, or validating ideas.
The irony? Skipping discovery doesn’t save time — it wastes it.
When teams bypass proper discovery, they end up building features that:
⛔️ Don’t solve the right problem
⛔ Drain engineering resources
️️⛔ Overcomplicate the product
⛔ Have poor adoption rates
I’ve seen this happen firsthand. Features that seemed like a “no-brainer” turned into expensive flops. The truth is, great products aren’t built faster by skipping discovery; they’re built smarter by investing in it.
But first, let’s take a step back.
What is Product Discovery — And How It Differs from User Research?
Product Discovery is the process of identifying and validating real customer problems before investing in development. It involves continuous learning, experimentation, and prioritization to ensure that teams build what truly matters. Unlike traditional User Research, which focuses on understanding behaviours and preferences, Product Discovery is action-oriented — it bridges insights with product strategy, guiding teams toward solutions that drive meaningful outcomes. In addition, attempts are usually made to gain insights very quickly by only testing assumptions and not entire concepts.
The Real-World Costs of Skipping Discovery
Let’s break down the hidden costs of ignoring proper discovery and how it impacts businesses:
1. Wasted Development Cycles (The $100K Mistake)
Building the wrong thing isn’t just frustrating — it’s expensive. Every sprint spent on an unnecessary feature is money down the drain.
💡 A study by CB Insights found that 42% of startups fail because they build products nobody wants.¹
💡 At Grover, we learnt this the hard way when we assumed that customers wanted to buy additional accessories to their rented devices — without spending enough time to confirm this assumption with our users first. After delivery, we realized that fewer users converted, but the operational overhead was too high, and the ROI was simply too low.
Lesson: Before committing development and operational resources, validate assumptions with real users.
✅ Run usability tests on prototypes before development.
✅ Use fake door tests to experiment before full-scale changes.
✅ Conduct quick customer interviews to uncover real pain points.
2. Feature Bloat (Solving Problems That Don’t Exist)
Ever seen a product with dozens of features, yet none of them seem useful? That’s feature bloat — when teams keep adding functionality without ensuring it solves real problems.
💡 In the 90s, Microsoft introduced his Office Assistant Clippy, which popped up whenever the software thought that the user needed help, only to annoy quite a few people.
💡 A former team I worked with spent months building an elaborate “wishlist” feature for an e-commerce app. Post-launch analytics showed less than 3% of users engaged with it — because the core friction wasn’t saving items, it was the checkout process.
Lesson: Just because you can build something doesn’t mean you should.
✅ Prioritize features based on user demand, not stakeholder opinions.
✅ Track user behaviour instead of just assuming what they need.
✅ Cut underused features to streamline the user experience.
3. Poor Adoption Rates (The “If We Build It, They Will Come” Fallacy)
One of the biggest misconceptions in product development is that launching a feature guarantees usage. Many teams assume customers will automatically adopt new functionality, only to see it go unnoticed.
💡 Google+ is a famous example. Despite massive resources and promotion, users didn’t engage with the platform because it failed to address real social networking needs.
💡 I’ve worked on teams where major features were released, but months later, adoption was under 10% — simply because we never got the time and resources to test whether users needed them.
Lesson: Build what users actually want, not what you assume they need.
✅ Conduct Discovery before development to gauge demand.
✅ Run beta tests to measure early adoption before a full rollout.
✅ Observe real-world user behaviour instead of relying on gut instinct.
4. Misalignment Between Teams (Chaos in Execution)
Without discovery, teams often operate in silos. Engineers build what they think is right, product managers push priorities without validation, and leadership assumes development equals progress.
💡 “Research shows 47% of workers have experienced failed projects as a result of misalignment, and 46% of workers have felt annoyed or frustrated because of it.”²
💡 I’ve worked, as so many of you, in organizations where the roadmap was dictated by executive demands rather than customer needs. This led to constant backtracking, wasted sprints, and frustration across departments.
Lesson: Product Discovery creates alignment across product, design, engineering, and business teams.
✅ Involve engineers early in the discovery process.
✅ Use customer research and data to drive product decisions.
✅ Align product goals with business outcomes, not just delivery timelines.
How to Build a Culture of Discovery
Escaping the build trap and fostering discovery requires a shift in mindset and process. Here’s how to embed discovery into your team’s workflow:
1. Make Discovery a Continuous Process
Product Discovery isn’t a one-time phase — it’s an ongoing process. Successful teams continuously balance exploration (discovery) and execution (delivery) to ensure they’re solving the right problems. A common misconception is that these phases are separate, but in reality, exploration and execution often happen in parallel — though not always within the same project.
✅ Allocate 20–30% of each sprint to discovery work.
✅ Set up lightweight experiments to test ideas before development.
✅ Encourage PMs and designers to engage with customers regularly.
2. Treat Discovery as an Investment, Not an Expense
Leadership often sees research as “slowing things down.” In reality, it prevents costly mistakes.
✅ Educate leadership on the cost of failed features.
✅ Show quick wins from discovery efforts to build trust.
✅ Demonstrate how small tests save money in the long run.
3. Use Frameworks That Prioritize Outcomes Over Outputs
Frameworks like OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), Jobs-to-Be-Done (JTBD), and Continuous Discovery (Teresa Torres) help teams stay focused on solving the right problems.
✅ OKRs: Align product efforts with business objectives.
✅ JTBD: Understand user motivations beyond surface-level needs.
✅ Continuous Discovery: Embed research and learning into every sprint.
Final Thought: Fast Doesn’t Mean Smart
Many teams skip discovery because they think it slows them down. But the real speed advantage comes from building the right things — not just building things quickly.
The most successful product teams aren’t the ones that ship the most — they’re the ones that create the most impact.
If your team struggles to balance delivery and discovery, start small:
- Run a 1-week product discovery sprint before any major feature.
- Set one key outcome-driven metric instead of a feature release goal.
- Test ideas with 5 user interviews before committing development time.
One final thought: Don’t wait for your organization to change — nor try to change it single-handedly. Instead, start Discovery within your team and lead by example, demonstrating its impact through real results.
Is your team investing enough in discovery? How do you ensure you’re solving the right problems? Drop your thoughts in the comments!
#productdiscovery #leanstartup #userresearch #productmanagement #avoidwaste
Enjoyed this article? Let’s continue the conversation on LinkedIn!
I regularly share insights on Product Discovery, Outcome-Driven Product Management, and Strategic Product Leadership.
Follow me HERE and let’s connect!
